[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [x

• To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Subject: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:58:27 -0700
• Cc: "'Aaron Skonnard'" <aarons@d...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>, "'John Cowan'" <jcowan@r...>, "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>
• References: <51B8ABCE456FD111899900805F6FD6EE0FF57AC7@m...>

"Klotz, Leigh" wrote:
> 
> One issue with the "borderline" and "psychotic" definitions as defined in
> Joe English's message is with XSLT namespace-alias, used way to perform XSLT
> transformations to produce an output containing XSLT elements.

I think that XSLT could and should change. If it worked in terms of URIs
instead of prefixes then I don't think you need to do anything so weird.
i.e. you would namespace-alias "http://www.w3.org/TR/.../escaped" to
"http://www.w3.org/TR/...", rather than "xslte" to "xslt".
-- 
 Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by Date: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Previous by thread: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread