• To: "'Mike Champion'" <mc@x...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:49:12 -0600
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <72CAHDATOC8LH1X2YECXRJF96TN6ZSP.3d6e663c@MChamp>

> Mike Champion wrote:
> ... 
> I [personally, not speaking for employer or W3C] think that it's
> time for discussion and experimentation with alternatives and
> refining of best practices with the current stuff, and that dumping
> the issue back on the W3C would be unproductive to counterproductive.

You're probably right. There isn't an easy answer especially when the
entire industry is playing tug-o-war on the same technology.

I was mostly just wondering if anyone from the W3C had been influenced
by some of the recent threads.

-aaron

...................................................
Aaron Skonnard, DevelopMentor (http://skonnard.com)
Essential XML Quick Reference now available online!
          http://www.develop.com/books
..................................................

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>

• References:
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by Date: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Previous by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread