[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: [xml

• To: Aaron Skonnard <aarons@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20]
• From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 03:39:31 +0300
• References: <003901c24fa5$ed6c4890$0600a8c0@gandalf>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Aaron Skonnard wrote:

>>Mike Champion wrote:
>>... 
>>I [personally, not speaking for employer or W3C] think that it's
>>time for discussion and experimentation with alternatives and
>>refining of best practices with the current stuff, and that dumping
>>the issue back on the W3C would be unproductive to counterproductive.
>>    
>>
>
>You're probably right. There isn't an easy answer especially when the
>entire industry is playing tug-o-war on the same technology.
>
... with the situation on informal groups like XML-DEV being worse; 
different people with different views simply want different things. XML 
Namespaces in XML just cannot keep everyone happy. Since we all agree on 
our dissagreement, the logical thing to do is to introduce more well 
targeted (and diverse) solutions.

Manos

• References:
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by Date: Re: Why is there no schema for RSS?
• Previous by thread: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread