|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
Norman Gray scripsit: > Namespaces (as I understand them) are a purely syntactical feature. Yes. > If some of the elements and attributes in an instance are in a certain > namespace, then I can look at that instance with namespace-shaped > spectacles and `see' only the things in that namespace. Only in the sense that you can look at, say, attribute names with "r"-shaped goggles and ignore all the ones that don't begin with "r". Namespaces are just a convention for extending the allowed names of element types and attributes without changing the XML 1.0 WF rules. -- John Cowan jcowan@r... www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy. Dennett and Bennett are well-known. Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett. There is also one Dummett. By their works shall ye know them. However, just as no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly known by his works. Indeed, Bummett does not exist. It is part of the function of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








