• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs.identifiers)
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:52:06 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200208201445.KAA23289@m...>

8/20/2002 10:31:47 AM, John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote:


>If you change the id attribute to rdf:id, then this is also RDF.
>Unless it contains mixed content, almost any reasonable XML document
>has an RDF interpretation.

An honest  question, not a troll: what can an RDF processor usefully
do with such a document?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs.
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers)
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: patterns vs. identifiers
• Next by Date: RE: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20)
• Previous by thread: Re: patterns vs. identifiers
• Next by thread: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs. identifiers)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread