• To: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>, "'Erik Wilde'" <net.dret@d...>
• Subject: RE: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20)
• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:54:05 -0400
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3D6179FA.670E8103@p...>

Hi Paul,

Paul said:
But the issue at hand is a *syntactic* *interoperability* issue. 

Didier replies:
I agree. The problem is that a processing agent (or user agent) can know
that a particular element is a link and this is a syntaxic problem even
if we sit the syntax on infoset principles.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin

• References:
  • Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs.identifiers)
• Next by Date: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:
• Previous by thread: Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20)
• Next by thread: Re: Infoset chewing gum (was Re: linking, 80/20)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread