• To: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@d...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?)
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:47:04 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcJFS/PnkvkJF+9lT628uuSog1hPewAAIvEr
• Thread-topic: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?)

Basic XQuery isn't type free. It still has the 46 XSD built-in types + the 2 new xs:duration subtypes. It also has interesting type issues like what happens when I do this 
 
function is-integer(xs:decimal $d) returns xs:boolean{
 
  $d instance of xs:integer 
}
 
  is-integer(xs:integer(6661))
 
Does the query return true or false? Both answers have unpleasant ramifications. 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@d...] 
	Sent: Fri 8/16/2002 10:39 AM 
	To: Dare Obasanjo; Simon St.Laurent 
	Cc: xml-dev@l... 
	Subject: Re:  RE: XQuery subset (was RE:  WXS acronym?)
	
	

	At 10:33 AM 8/16/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
	>How hard would this be to describe? Wouldn't just be a bulleted list of
	>features not to use (including comparison and arithmetic operators) ?
	
	When the next XQuery documents are published (EXTREMELY soon now), look up
	"Basic XQuery" in the Conformance section.
	
	Jonathan
	
	

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WXS acronym?
• Next by Date: RE: XML, hypertext
• Previous by thread: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?)
• Next by thread: RE: RE: XQuery subset (was RE: WXS acronym?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread