• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:45:01 -0700
• Thread-index: AcJJWwi878RCDCHZR8W00rZBkSV0GgAAND+g
• Thread-topic: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@a...] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:33 PM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  A multi-step approach on defining 
> object-orientednature of DOM
> 
> 
> > 6. Several instances of the use of java.net.URL for 
> normalization of a 
> > namespace URI that breaks comparability.  This leads to 
> explanations 
> > that "a namespace URI is *not* a [java.net.]URL!"
> 
> Could you give some more details of this one?

What if you want a Java class that represents syntactically valid
namespace names? Until J2SE 1.4, java.net.URL was people's frequent
choice since most namespace URIs they saw were HTTP URLs.  


-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Putting in a request to go home early is the best way to jinx yourself
and end up working overtime.     

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

• Prev by Date: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM
• Next by Date: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
• Previous by thread: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM
• Next by thread: ERPANET workshop Urbino
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread