• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM
• From: Sam Hunting <shunting@e...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 20:53:07 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: Mike Champion <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E0696F811@r...>

> 
> Like I said Joe Blow developer isn't reading W3C specs. Besides
> implementers who cares about the infoset?

Uh, maybe information owners who want to make sure their data is
well-structured (ie, with things that look like attributes acting like
attributes) without being dependent on one or another software vendor?
 
Sam Hunting
eTopicality, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Turn your searching experience into a finding experience."(tm)

Topic map consulting and training: www.etopicality.com
Free open source topic map tools:  www.goose-works.org

XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web.
Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-74960-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Next by Date: XSD <any> and namespaces
• Previous by thread: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Next by thread: Re: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread