|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: WXS acronym?
Henry S. Thompson wrote: >I also note that we're doing fine >without acronyms for Web Services, Semantic Web, XLink, XML Base, XML >Signature, XPath, XML Infoset, to rattle off the first few I thought >of. > One major difference is that none of the above has an associated file suffix. And where they do have common namespace prefixes, those *are* commonly undewrstood as referencing the technology in question. >I just think the acronym space is too heavily populated for it to be >much use outside of very focussed groups to use lots of acronyms. > That's a fair point in general, but I don't think it applies once you've already associated acronyms to a language via file suffixes and namespace prefixes. Francis. -- "Never mind manoeuvre, go straight at 'em." - Admiral Horatio Nelson
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








