• To: "Joe English" <jenglish@f...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:33:39 +0300
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcJBTil6j3NFzWMdRH2DBi2C3C+rpQAg9kGA
• Thread-topic: Comparable considered necessary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe English [mailto:jenglish@f...] 

> "Are X and Y the same URI?" is answerable.  "Do X and Y identify
> the same resource?" is not.

If the resource is retrievable, it should be the same, otherwise we have
a huge problem. What is missing from the puzzle today is a clean
separation of retrievable VS non-retrievable resources, with namespaces
being the greatest example...

Manos

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Comparable considered necessary
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Next by Date: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Previous by thread: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Next by thread: Re: Comparable considered necessary
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread