• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:56:17 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3D5CBFC5.7010803@e...> (Robin Berjon's message of "Fri,16 Aug 2002 11:03:01 +0200")
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208151523060.31880-100000@t...><3D5CBFC5.7010803@e...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

/ Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> was heard to say:
| Even that will fail to address the general case in fact. If a class
| called "importantly" is present you'll match wrongly. Besides, there

Yes, but that's not too hard to work around.

| may be nasty case-sensitivity problems floating around depending on
| whether there's HTML involved at some point or not.

Case insensitivity is an I18N nightmare. Don't go there.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@S...    | The man with ten children is better off than
XML Standards Architect | the one with ten thousand fonts of type,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | because the man with ten children doesn't
                        | want any more.

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: XML, hypertext
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread