Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
/ "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> was heard to say:
| I think at least that it's clear that XLink by itself isn't enough, but
| getting beyond that is more difficult.
If one wanted to pursue a purely XLink solution, I think defining role
URIs would be sufficient. Roles allow you to express the meaning of a
link or arc. For the XHTML case, those roles could be fixed, I think.
As I think I said before, the really hard problem is dealing with
elements that have more than one attribute with link semantics
(href/longdesc).
I think Tim's rule applies, if you need more than one, use
subelements.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman.Walsh@S... | It is important what a man still plans at the
XML Standards Architect | end. It shows the measure of injustice in his
Sun Microsystems, Inc. | death.--Elias Canetti
|
