• To: "'John Cowan'" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:
• From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:14:49 +0200
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200208201220.IAA21154@m...>

>> As an infoset advocate, you really *should* be aware of all the
nuances.

>Or even as an opponent.

I am firmly convinced that any sufficiently advanced technology has an
infinite number of nuances to it, and that XML and associated specs is
sufficiently advanced.

*any similarity to a rather famous dictum of Arthur C. Clarke in the
above was intended.

• References:
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:
• Next by Date: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20]
• Previous by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:
• Next by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread