[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on

• To: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 07:48:52 -0400
• In-reply-to: <00c601c249a0$d269a890$32f5d90c@c1980223a>
• References: <200208212113.RAA13444@m...><200208220017.g7M0HM331421@d...><00c601c249a0$d269a890$32f5d90c@c1980223a>

At 12:57 AM -0500 8/22/02, Jeff Rafter wrote:

>For example, I can't reliably mix my own vocabulary into XHTML because I
>can't validate it or it isn't supported well.

Sure you can. This is exactly what modular XHTML is designed for. The 
specs give detailed instructions for how to mix your own vocabularies 
into XHTML by setting the appropriate parameter entity references in 
a driver DTD.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
    • From: Ken Sall <kensall@c...>
  • XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Next by Date: Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM)
• Previous by thread: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
• Next by thread: XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread