[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon

• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>,Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
• From: Ken Sall <kensall@c...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:28:01 -0400
• References: <200208212113.RAA13444@m...><200208220017.g7M0HM331421@d...><00c601c249a0$d269a890$32f5d90c@c1980223a><p04330100b98a7fd96bad@[192.168.254.4]>
• Reply-to: Ken Sall <ken@s...>

> At 12:57 AM -0500 8/22/02, Jeff Rafter wrote:
>
> >For example, I can't reliably mix my own vocabulary into XHTML because I
> >can't validate it or it isn't supported well.
>
> Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>
> Sure you can. This is exactly what modular XHTML is designed for. The
> specs give detailed instructions for how to mix your own vocabularies
> into XHTML by setting the appropriate parameter entity references in
> a driver DTD.

Perhaps a more accessible starting point would be W3C's tutorial, "XHTML
Modules and Markup Languages - How to create XHTML Family modules and markup
languages for fun and profit" [1]

[1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Guide/xhtml-m12n-tutorial/

- Ken Sall               kensall@c... or ken@s...
- XML Consultant/Author  http://mywebpages.comcast.net/kensall/
- XML Family of Specifications: A Practical Guide (just published)
- http://WDVL.Internet.com/Authoring/Languages/XML/XMLFamily/

• Follow-Ups:
  • How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? )
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
  • Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature
• Next by Date: RE: Schema Sanity Check
• Previous by thread: XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?)
• Next by thread: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best Practice = Vanilla XML? )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread