[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the

• To: tpassin@c... (Thomas B. Passin)
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:18:35 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <002c01c23a26$7585dab0$fe193044@tbp1> from "Thomas B. Passin" at Aug 02, 2002 09:13:57 AM

Thomas B. Passin scripsit:

> So the default namespace allows you to convert a document to having a
> namespace with minimal pain and breakage.  If you look at it that way, it is
> a means for handling legacy markup, and no one has to use it for new work.

Well, that is one application of the default namespace.  But I would get
very tired of creating new mono-namespace (or nearly so) documents
without this particular minimization.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites Dennett.
There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However, just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is hardly
known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create him.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
    • From: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@c...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang=""
• Next by Date: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread