[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 23:08:05 -0400
• In-reply-to: <20020817024254.GB1698@s...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020816221755.026d73a8@m...><000b01c24546$9ef32f80$6401a8c0@didierhome><p04330101b982cad47be1@[192.168.254.4]><5.1.0.14.0.20020816221755.026d73a8@m...>

At 08:42 PM 8/16/2002 -0600, Matt Gushee wrote:
>They don't do anything at all until browser makers implement them and
>developers use them. I wonder how many will feel the benefits to them
>are sufficient to abandon the tried-and-true 'href'?

         You mean like the tried-and-true "img"? You're making the point 
for me. XHTML 2.0 would already going to face some severe roadblocks, due 
to its abandonment of several tried-and-true HTML tags. Since it's going to 
face those roadblocks already, there's no significant cost to losing "href".

--->Ben

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ben Trafford <ben@l...>
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread