• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 10:01:29 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200208020917.KAA09200@n...>
• References: <E17aUQ5-0005L1-00@m...><E17aUQ5-0005L1-00@m...>

At 10:17 AM 8/2/2002 +0100, David Carlisle wrote:
>It turns out that you are not using the definition of "global attribute"
>from the namespace spec. It's not that your definition is bad it's just
>confusing to discus a spec using different meanings for the terms
>defined in the spec.

I think it's also fair to suggest that "Global attribute" is at best 
underspecified, defined only (and pretty vaguely) in the _non-normative_ 
Appendix A.

We might do well to simply jettison that non-normative baggage.

Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Next by Date: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread