[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Hi Tim,

On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 20:13, Tim Bray wrote:
> Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> 
> > This parser is _not_ XML 1.0-compliant, ...

> Hehe.  Sounds like an XML-SW parser to me.  -Tim

But, shouldn't we be really nervous about things that have XML in their
name but don't enforce well-formedness ?  :-)))

TAM is a careful name indeed!

Eric
-- 
Rendez-vous à Paris.
                          http://www.technoforum.fr/integ2002/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member