• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:23:38 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <r01050300-1015-C32EC535B45A11D69F470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> John Cowan writes:
> 
>>3) Eschew mixed content.
> 
> Is this an absolute must for such RDF interpretation?
> 
> It really seems to highlight that RDF and XML are different planets.

RDF and XML *are* different planets.  RDF is a general-purpose 
knowledge-representation framework that can be serialized in XML; but 
its relationship to XML is not any tighter than any other custom 
vocabulary aimed at any other particular problem space. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: Tiny API for Markup, Parser
• Next by Date: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Next by thread: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread