• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:34:56 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200208201636.MAA25248@m...>

John Cowan writes:
> 3) Eschew mixed content.

Is this an absolute must for such RDF interpretation?

It really seems to highlight that RDF and XML are different planets.


-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Next by Date: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: patterns vs.
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Next by thread: Re: RDF Interpretation of XML documents (was Re: [xml-d
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread