• To: james.anderson@s..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: namespace reprise
• From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:07:26 +0300
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B841@HQ5> <3D63917D.2040704@h...> <3D63A050.922A522C@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020721

james anderson wrote:

>"Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" wrote:
>  
>
>>[remarks about the goal of a 1-1 relation between namespace name and schema, and thereby universal name and schema component.]
>>    
>>
>
>this would be a mistake.
>
>just as it is important to let an application bind the behaviour associated with
>a name as late as possible, a generic document processor should able to bind as
>late as possible those aspects of the behaviour which it handles. which is when
>the document definition is interpreted, not when the name is parsed.
>

Having the document definition location information as the name does not 
mandate a certain point of evaluating that information beyond the 
semantics of a name.

Manos

• References:
  • RE: namespace reprise
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: namespace reprise
    • From: "Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)" <mbatsis@h...>
  • Re: namespace reprise
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XHTML 2.0: the one bright light?? (Was: linking, 80/20)
• Next by Date: Re: namespace reprise
• Previous by thread: Re: namespace reprise
• Next by thread: Re: namespace reprise
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread