[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RE: maps

• To: dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo)
• Subject: Re: RE: maps
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 11:48:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: kk@k... (Kohsuke Kawaguchi), catcode@c... (J. David Eisenberg), simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621EC6@r...> from "Dare Obasanjo" at Aug 06, 2002 08:42:10 AM

Dare Obasanjo scripsit:

> So basically I can write code for how to validate a datatype which
> plugs into the validator depending on whether the validator is designed
> in such a modular manner and knows where to look for my code?

Yes, plus the fact that there is a standard plugin framework for Java,
.NET, COM, and vanilla C++ frameworks.

> So for some cases, it isn't as bad as having to hack the validator
> yourself but it's still doesn't interoperate very well.

It interoperates as well as you can expect considering the goal of flexibility.
Formal interoperability is always enhanced by allowing fewer options, at
the expense of greater rigidity.

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
"If I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarves."
        --Murray Gell-Mann

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: maps
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: maps
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: DOM L3 views.idl question
• Next by Date: Re: Re: maps
• Previous by thread: RE: maps
• Next by thread: Re: RE: maps
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread