[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: AW: Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?

• To: Rohde@b...
• Subject: Re: AW: Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:10:59 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <B3977F23833B8348B9C5732A83A8EFA62157F9@BBMAIL> (message fromSebastian Rohde on Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:32:33 +0200)
• References: <B3977F23833B8348B9C5732A83A8EFA62157F9@BBMAIL>

> Would it be a problem to have carriage returns
> within an attribute?

they get normalised to spaces by the XML parser.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • AW: Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
    • From: Sebastian Rohde <Rohde@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: AW: Empty tag with attribute effective for parsing?
• Next by thread: Trust
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread