• To: dbox@m...
• Subject: Re: Global/Local attributes
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 09:42:14 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <CFC4F26947496E4092489B2425614958057FA758@s...>(dbox@m...)
• References: <CFC4F26947496E4092489B2425614958057FA758@s...>

> XPath node tests use the attribute rule [2].
>  
> XML Query node tests use the element rule [3].

Xquery, not being XML, doesn't really have a default namespace in the
sense of xpath-in-xslt, but other than that it is just a superset of
Xpath isn't it?

I can't see anything in the xquery spec that indicates any different
processing for xquery or xpath.

xpath2 and xqueryactually have a thord rule, they allow specification 
of the namespace to be used for unprefied Qnames. This needn't be
no-namespace (as attributes) or the current default namepsace for
elements.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• References:
  • RE: Global/Local attributes
    • From: "Don Box" <dbox@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Please no UOM (was Re: maps)
• Next by Date: Re: browsers that support XSL
• Previous by thread: RE: Default namespaces are *evil*! (RE: Global/Local attributes)
• Next by thread: XML Core WG needs input on xml:lang=""
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread