|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: maps
> >> So when do we stop relying on idiom and switch to markup? > > > > It is a choice made every day by document designers. > > What level of granularity to use. What are their expectations on > > the libraries and parsing that will be available at the receiving end. > > Unfortunately this leads to (at least) two things: the requirement of > complex technologies to comprehend the text values; assumptions that data > types correspond to text values. I would re-write this as: * The requirement of technology for parsing text I guess "complex" is relative, and if by "comprehend" you mean some sort of AI thingie, I don't see why. All it takes is parsing text. People do this all the time in their sleep. This is a requirement that doesn't bother me at all. * The expression of rules to relate text to data types This is exactly what I've been wanting, so again I don't see a down side. -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com Track chair, XML/Web Services One Boston: http://www.xmlconference.com/ Basic XML and RDF techniques for knowledge management, Part 7 - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think12.html Keeping pace with James Clark - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/libra ry/x-jclark.html Python and XML development using 4Suite, Part 3: 4RDF - http://www-105.ibm.com/developerworks/education.nsf/xml-onlinecourse-bytitle/8A 1EA5A2CF4621C386256BBB006F4CEC
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








