• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: DOM L3 views.idl question
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 11:10:39 -0500
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621EAD@r...> <20020806112358.E930.KK@k...> <03e001c23d60$87c90c50$32f5d90c@c1980223a>

> Is this still under development? I have a link to the actual IDL
definition
> [1] but I can't find it from the DOM home page.

I finally found the link by hunting around [1]-- but it is still rather old.
Overall (if it is still under development), my question was this: Why does
the IDL for BooleanItem and ContentItem not specify that the value
properties are read-only. Base on the wording in the draft these properties
are no different from StringItem and IntegerItem, for instance. The Java
binding has this same model...

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-DOM-Level-3-Views-20001115/

Thanks,
Jeff Rafter
Defined Systems
http://www.defined.net
XML Development and Developer Web Hosting

• References:
  • RE: maps
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: maps
    • From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@k...>
  • DOM L3 views.idl question
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: maps
• Next by Date: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Previous by thread: DOM L3 views.idl question
• Next by thread: Re: DOM L3 views.idl question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread