|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Namespaces blur (A multi-step approach on defining object
At 3:55 PM +0200 8/22/02, Eric van der Vlist wrote: >That's not fully accurate either since it's leading to think that global >(qualified) attributes do not belong to their parent element which isn't >true... I see your point. Maybe what we need is 1. All attributes belong to their parent element. 2. No attribute (or anything else) belongs to a namespace. 3. The meaning of an unqualified attribute is determined exclusively by the element to which it belongs (and that element's own context). 4. The meaning of a prefixed attribute is determined, in general, both by the element to which it belongs and the attribute's global definition, though in some cases it may be just one or the other. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








