• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 14:22:31 +1000
• References: <f3.1f45acab.2a84eada@a...>

From: <AndrewWatt2000@a...>
 
> We then appear to have two (competing?) hyperlinking technologies intended 
> for use on some/all XML elements. 

There is also another approach lurking in the wings, to wit: use a schema
which declares the linking properties of various information items. 

E.g.

<attribute name="href" type="anyURI"  xlink:type="href" xlink:actuate="user" />

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• References:
  • XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Next by Date: Re: XLink olden days
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Next by thread: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread