• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:26:42 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• References: <r01050300-1015-875E9D93AFB111D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722

Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> Norm Walsh writes:
> 
>>On the other hand, this is an, uhm, LSI, and is sure to be greeted by
>>some with the same enthusiasm as the PSVI :-).
> 
> Provided that there's a clear mechanism for serializing the LSI as XML
> in some easily processed form (XLink-like or not), I suspect you can
> navigate those rocks.

Yeah.  This is the best suggestion I've seen yet for allowing the HTML 
WG to alleviate their angst and auto-magically make their existing link 
vocabulary recognizable (in some sense) as an XLink.  If, however, they 
wanted to insert a general-purpose multi-ended link facility of the sort 
that XLink's complex link was designed for, it would seem best if they 
put it in the XLink namespace and use ordinary xlink:href syntax for the 
purpose.  --Tim

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: PushingSAX events out onto the Web?)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread