• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:13:26 -0400
• Cc: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
• In-reply-to: <87ofc5tivg.fsf@n...>

Norm Walsh writes:
> On the other hand, this is an, uhm, LSI, and is sure to be greeted by
> some with the same enthusiasm as the PSVI :-).

Provided that there's a clear mechanism for serializing the LSI as XML
in some easily processed form (XLink-like or not), I suspect you can
navigate those rocks.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • SLAIX (was: Can XLink be fixed)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Re: Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: PushingSAX events out onto the Web?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread