• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,"Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
• Subject: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• From: "Leigh Dodds" <ldodds@i...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:17:54 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-F29E9050AF8911D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

> > What's the difference between streaming SAX events versus "streaming
> > the XML"?  /Roger
...
> Or maybe you were planning on transmitting "SAX events" using pieces of
> XML?  The start tag for startElement() maybe?  There are lots of
> different possibilities.

This is what I was wondering. Why not just send the XML you want 
parsed rather than cook up a means to serialize SAX events? Surely 
that'll be more work?

Any XML parser will start parsing as soon as it receives the start element, 
so you can have the document being incrementally parsed on the client 
as it's being spat out by the server.

Doesn't Jabber do something similar?

L.

• References:
  • Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• Next by Date: RE: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• Previous by thread: Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• Next by thread: Re: Pushing SAX events out onto the Web?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread