• To: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 09:20:11 -0700
• Thread-index: AcI9Y1joujvjI413QTaRlxsUWngrtQAAWsHD
• Thread-topic: W3C XFrames - first public WD published

Just out of curiosity, does anyone else wonder why there is an XHTML 2.0 when XHTML 1.0 doesn't seem to have caught on? Anyone involved with it care to chime in? 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer [mailto:schnitz@m...] 
	Sent: Tue 8/6/2002 9:07 AM 
	To: xml-dev@l... 
	Cc: 
	Subject:  W3C XFrames - first public WD published
	
	

	Just to let everyone know, the W3C today released the first
	public working draft of XFrames:
	
	http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/
	
	It is anticipated to replace frames in a future version of
	XHTML, perhaps XHTML 2, another fresh new WD:
	
	http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/
	
	- Sebastian
	
	
	

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Tags and Types (was Re: Re: maps)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: maps
• Previous by thread: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Next by thread: RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread