RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
At 09:20 AM 8/6/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote: >Just out of curiosity, does anyone else wonder why there is an XHTML 2.0 >when XHTML 1.0 doesn't seem to have caught on? Anyone involved with it >care to chime in? Maybe they're hoping that Microsoft will takes steps to recognize and possibly even implement a 2.0? That 1.0 and 1.1 were just too low a version number? 1.0 and 1.1 were pretty much just codifications of existing HTML 4.0 practice redone using XML syntax. 2.0 should be a big step forward from that. Simon St.Laurent "Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format