[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Comparable considered necessary

• To: clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
• Subject: Re: Comparable considered necessary
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:52:17 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: prb@f... ('Paul Brown'), xml-dev@l... ("xml-Dev (E-mail)"), jcowan@r... (John Cowan)
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B7B6@HQ5> from "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" at Aug 12, 2002 08:28:33 AM

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> Umm... that is how things work now.  It only falls over 
> when the [namespace] name as unique name is considered to have a 
> semantic value of its own right, when in fact, it is a 
> meaningless string assigned a value in the context of 
> the process using it.

It's *almost* meaningless, Len: there's a source-of-authority inside.

John Cowan                              jcowan@r...
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
Thor Heyerdahl recounts his attempt to prove Rudyard Kipling's theory
that the mongoose first came to India on a raft from Polynesia.
	--blurb for _Rikki-Kon-Tiki-Tavi_

• References:
  • RE: Comparable considered necessary
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Comparable considered necessary
• Next by Date: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Previous by thread: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Next by thread: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread