• To: aarons@d... (Aaron Skonnard)
• Subject: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r... ('John Cowan'), simonstl@s... ('Simon St.Laurent'), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <001201c24f7d$68c3bd80$0600a8c0@gandalf> from "Aaron Skonnard" at Aug 29, 2002 10:59:14 AM

Aaron Skonnard scripsit:

> relating to namespaces, from my perspective there seems to be strong, if
> unofficial, consensus that the namespaces specification, as it sits
> today, has caused major problems.

Yes, indeed.  But there seems to be no consensus on what is to be done.
"Everybody complains about the weather, but nobody does anything about it."

-- 
John Cowan  jcowan@r...  www.ccil.org/~cowan  www.reutershealth.com
"If I have seen farther than others, it is because I was standing on
the shoulders of giants."
        --Isaac Newton

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• References:
  • RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by Date: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Previous by thread: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by thread: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread