• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:28:57 -0400
• In-reply-to: <126.1554b7ee.2a8ea8d3@a...>

At 03:13 PM 8/16/2002 -0400, AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote:

>I think Ann may be referring to:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0158.html

And several others, including:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000OctDec/0123.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000JulSep/0169.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JulSep/0066.html

Note the dates on these gang, this is not a new issue by any stretch of the 
concept.

Ann

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: XForms etc Terminology (Was: WXS acronym?)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread