• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:34:24 -0400
• In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020816152440.00e7fda0@m...>
• References: <126.1554b7ee.2a8ea8d3@a...>

You know, archives can be fun.

Also see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000JanMar/0073.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000AprJun/0006.html

Plus and old gem from Simon: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/1999JanMar/0004.html

Folks, these are more than 2 and 3 years old. Never dealt with to the point 
of usability.

Ann

At 03:28 PM 8/16/2002 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote:
>At 03:13 PM 8/16/2002 -0400, AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote:
>
>>I think Ann may be referring to:
>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jul/0158.html
>
>And several others, including:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000OctDec/0123.html
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000JulSep/0169.html
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JulSep/0066.html
>
>Note the dates on these gang, this is not a new issue by any stretch of 
>the concept.

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Re: WXS acronym?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread