|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Is XML Ubiquitous yet? (was Re: Pushing SAX even
>I'm curious, not trying to second-guess anyone or pontificate any more >... are there any commercially interesting platforms that have >decent development tools and networking tools, but don't have XML parsers >readily available? Well if you consider Rebol as a platform as well as a programming language, which one can come to do quite easily, I would say yeah, insofar as the built in XML datatype with Rebol is not conformant, although Gavin Mckenzie has improved upon that at http://www3.sympatico.ca/gavin.mckenzie/ and http://mail.python.org/pipermail/xml-sig/1999-December/001709.html , which is widespread enough in the community. At any rate the situation exists with Rebol where it is easy to build to improper XML, and to consume improper XML, using the more readily accessible tools in the language/platform. Aside from that Rebol doesn't have a lot of the associated technologies that we come to depend on with XML(no DOM, no SAX, no xpath in Rebol, no native Rebol xslt processor), so you can't just move your favorite processing methodologies over as I have found :( of course Rebol still has quite a bit of that "built it if you want it" spirit, always assuming one has the time and who has that anymore?(Actually I have ambitions to do so for some things, I'm just overworked, but otherwise Rebol is a very cool language). Other than that I would suppose Xml is ubiquitous.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








