• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:35:13 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-FC8DE922B44411D69F470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
>
> Sure thing, but RDF isn't designed with human-readable in 
> mind at all
  
You're confusing RDF with it's XML (which is not unlike confusing HTTP
messages with octet streams). 

RDF is very much designed with humans in mind; the graph can be
presented any way you see fit. In my humble but correct opinion, RDF
graphs are perfectly clear, until you choose to represent them in an
unclear way, in this case using XML.

regards,
Bill de hÓra

..
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: namespace reprise
• Next by Date: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• Previous by thread: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• Next by thread: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread