[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XLink 2.0 Requirements

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XLink 2.0 Requirements
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:51:44 -0400

Liam's messages still don't appear to be getting through via the list.  

Editorial addition: I strongly recommend that people take a look at
Liam's slides.  I disagree with his suggestions quite completely, but
it's very certainly worth the encounter.


====== Forwarded Message ======
Date: 8/15/02 5:17 PM
Received: 8/15/02 5:17 PM
From: liam@w... (Liam Quin)

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:47:19AM -0700, Micah Dubinko wrote:
[...]
> For example, it's not clear how the following could be recast to use
XLink:
> <xhtml:form action="http://submit.example.com" method="post">
> <!-- form submission is a link, sort of -->

I gave a talk at Extreme Markup about using a unified syntax for
representing relationships between resources, such as this example.

It might be a bit radical for many people though -- my suggestion
was to use a representation that happened also to be valid RDF.

You can see the slides I used at
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/papers/2002-xmlr-extreme-markup-montreal/
with a very terse transcription.  (For those who were there, I have not
captured the scrolling green animation in full, sorry).

Liam

(wondering if this will make it out to xml-dev!)

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, liam@w...

====== End Forwarded Message ======
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: RE: XLink 2.0 Requirements
• Next by thread: P2P and URIs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread