• To: <AndrewWatt2000@a...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XLink and XForms
• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:35:08 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <110.1783f762.2aa0d544@a...>

Hi Andrew

Andrew said:
XForms uses (or currently proposes to use) a src attribute but claims 
conformance to XLink semantics.

The current XForms WD for which comments must be in by 5th September is 
located at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xforms-20020821/

Didier replies:
Thanx for the pointer. Now the count is:
a) two WG are not using a generic linking syntax (i.e. Xform and XHTML).
b) one WG using it (i.e. SVG). Is there an other XML specification in
addition to SVG using the Xlink syntax?
The Byzantine schism is on its good way :-)

Cheers
Didier PH Martin

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XLink and XForms
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • XLink and XForms
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: XLink WG new charter
• Next by Date: Re: XLink and XForms
• Previous by thread: XLink and XForms
• Next by thread: Re: XLink and XForms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread