• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: XLink and XForms
• From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:03:48 EDT

In the recent discussions on XLink (or not) I don't think the avoidance of 
XLink in the XForms specification received much (any?) attention.

XForms uses (or currently proposes to use) a src attribute but claims 
conformance to XLink semantics.

The current XForms WD for which comments must be in by 5th September is 
located at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xforms-20020821/

I have already made several comments which are among those located at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2002Aug/

Steven Pemberton made a defence of the avoidance of XLink at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2002Aug/0026.html
which I found wholly unconvincing.

Andrew Watt

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XLink and XForms
    • From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@d...>
  • RE: XLink and XForms
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: [ANN] Pollo 0.3.4 XML editor released
• Next by Date: XLink WG new charter
• Previous by thread: [ANN] Pollo 0.3.4 XML editor released
• Next by thread: RE: XLink and XForms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread