[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:43:22 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3D5D29E4.6090603@t...>

> Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> 
> > I miss XArc (http://jfinity.com/xarc/spec-current/index.html)  if we
> > want to talk about clean.
> 
> Er the role/arcrole stuff in XLink is a direct steal from XArc,
there's 
> even a thank-you in the text of the spec.  I think the theft was 
> successful, i.e. they got the good pieces.  

I know (and participated in) the history.  My point here is that
importing XArc into a larger XLink spec doesn't automatically make XLink
clean.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: WXS acronym?
• Next by Date: Re: WXS acronym?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread