• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: (Fwd) Re: WXS acronym?
• From: "Matt Gushee" <mgushee@h...>
• Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:55:54 -0600
• Priority: normal

Oops ... sorry. This was supposed to go to the list in the first place.

------- Forwarded message follows -------
From:           	Matt Gushee <mgushee@h...>
To:             	Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-
technologies.com>
Subject:        	Re:  WXS acronym?
Date sent:      	Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:52:22 -0600

On 16 Aug 2002 at 12:31, Jonathan Robie wrote:

> Things have names. If you have political points to make, perhaps you could 
> make them *next* to the names of the things to which you refer, so that it 
> is clear what you are referring to? After all, nobody can use Google to 
> search the W3C web site and find the specs to which you refer by the names 
> you use.

Since you mentioned Google, I thought I'd try a Google search on 
"XSDL". Interesting. The first link to an address in the w3c.org domain 

was to a message in the xmlschema-dev archives on the second page; 
there were no other links to w3c.org in the first 10 pages of results. 
So, perhaps searchability is a reason to avoid acronyms altogether, but 

it is evidently not a reason to prefer XSDL.

FWIW.

Matt Gushee
Englewood, CO, USA
------- End of forwarded message -------

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: RE: WXS acronym?
• Next by thread: XML-Schema Help
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread