• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: browsers that support XSL
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 13:02:23 -0400
• References: <5.1.1.6.0.20020804180201.02b889e0@p...>

[sandr8]

> mozilla works better than explorer but XUL is too slow...

That depends on what you want to do. If you need to clear out a really long
select box (nulling out each option) and repopulate it using javascript,
Mozilla is __much__ faster than IE.

Cheers,

Tom P

• Follow-Ups:
  • [OT] Mozilla (Was Re: browsers that support XSL)
    • From: sandr8 <sandreight@q...>

• References:
  • RE: browsers that support XSL
    • From: sandr8 <sandreight@q...>

• Prev by Date: Re: browsers that support XSL
• Next by Date: Re: maps
• Previous by thread: RE: browsers that support XSL
• Next by thread: [OT] Mozilla (Was Re: browsers that support XSL)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread