• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
• From: "Niklas Gustavsson" <niklas@p...>
• Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 16:25:40 +0200
• Newsgroups: gmane.text.xml.devel
• References: <20888.0697995939$1028886803@n...>
• Sender: news <news@m...>

> Additionally the XHTML 2.0 WD has no indication that I could find of
support
> for XPointer. One wonders why the primitive # fragment identifier is the
only
> (as far as I could see) fragment identifier in W3C's "new generation"
XHTML?

Just a minor note, there is another fragment identifier occuring in the
XFrames WD, #frames(). Not in the XHTML spec but pretty close :-)

http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xframes-20020806/#s_populating

/niklas
www.protocol7.com

• Prev by Date: RE: code challenge
• Next by Date: RE: XPointer architecture (Re: XPointer and XML Schema)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Multidimensional XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread