• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:46:08 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-94E893E6B50811D69F470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] 
>
> Bill de hÓra
> > Go and look at n-triples, then the diagrams in the RDF specs, then 
> > RDF-XML. These are all RDF. When you're done, come back and tell me 
> > where the readability problem in RDF sits. Then I'll send 
> you off to 
> > look at UML diagrams and the XMI.
> 
> Spoken like someone who speaks identifiers.  I don't.

Oh dear. Show me where the readability problem is Simon.

regards,
Bill de hÓra
..
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: patterns vs. identifiers
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM
• Next by Date: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• Previous by thread: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• Next by thread: RE: patterns vs. identifiers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread