• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XLink and XForms
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 05:22:49 +0000
• In-reply-to: <3D6F9D86.5070001@y...>
• References: <000a01c25034$3bbe6490$6401a8c0@didierhome> <3D6F9D86.5070001@y...>

"J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...> wrote:

| BTW the use (abuse) of XPath for references within XForm isn't something 
| I appreciate very much.

It meets the Sufficient Ingenuity and Obligatory HighTech criteria, and I
believe it's a good example of what Keith Boone meant when he wrote:

  "Since none of use can backwards in time and change history, whatever
   solution you adopt that resolves the problem will build a dependency   
   upon another specification."

• References:
  • RE: XLink and XForms
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: XLink and XForms
    • From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XLink and XForms
• Next by Date: Re: XLink and XForms
• Previous by thread: Re: XLink and XForms
• Next by thread: Re: XLink and XForms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread